Neia Neutuladh is a user on esperanto.masto.host. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse. If you don't, you can sign up here.

I saw elsewhere - perhaps Twitter - a criticism of the #cyberpunk idea, reflected in Cyberpunk 2077, that the unaltered human body is somehow sacred, and that augmenting it is profane. The criticism noted that this was, at its core, transphobic.

The critic then turned the idea on its head into a trans-positive cyberpunk that eschewed "humanity" in favor of "essence". Maybe one person's essence is complete when they're born; maybe another's essence is lacking until they augment themselves.

There are other deep criticisms of a view of #cyberpunk that insists that unaltered bodies are the only true humanity, too. E.g.: authors with this view tend to conflate increasing augmentation with a decrease in emotion, as though expressive emotion were innately human–never mind autistic people, people with flat affects, etc.

But I like the idea that the criticism offers - that augmentation allows a person to uncover their true self, rather than being limited by the body they were born with.

Neia Neutuladh @dhasenan

@noelle That reminds me of _Glasshouse_ by Charlie Stross. A bunch of people damaged by participating in war, where their minds were inserted into tanks and other inhuman things, mostly wanting baseline human forms for themselves -- but forms they chose. And they accept people who want something different; they just mostly want to feel as human as possible, and they choose bodies that help them do that.